The rise of prosecutions in high-income countries

Edwin J. Bernard
Published: 18 July 2010

Twitter

  • RT @BarbCardell: CBP Chief Hastings acknowledges that they separate families at the border based on HIV status. Here is our communities re… 26 Jul 2019
  • RT @gnpplus: STATEMENT: GNP+ @HIVJusticeNet condemn dismissal of appeal in Singapore HIV criminalisation case.“HIV prevention is a shared r… 03 Jul 2019
  • Breaking news! @gnpplus and @HIVJusticeNet condemn dismissal of appeal in Singapore #HIVcriminalisation case… https://t.co/cMi3NqWfcn 03 Jul 2019
  • Please help us document the process of supporting HIV criminalisation survivors. We are seeking input from legal o… https://t.co/LsJPxnukPP 27 Jun 2019
  • We wholeheartedly agree. A strong @UNAIDS means a strong human rights-based approach to @HIV #HIVisnotacrime… https://t.co/1PM9MmmKGc 26 Jun 2019
  • RT @alexmcclelland: The Global Commission on HIV & the Law is concerned about the increased misuse of individuals’ personal health informat… 21 Jun 2019
  • BREAKING: Justice Committee report recommends wide-ranging reforms to HIV criminalisation in Canada. Congratuations… https://t.co/wzBfQ2DEhl 18 Jun 2019
  • RT @AIDSLAW: We've spent decades advocating for this critical change. We're very happy that it's a key part of the Justice Committee's repo… 17 Jun 2019
  • Published today - 'Using Research in the Fight Against #HIVCriminalisation - A Guide for #Activists' to help advoca… https://t.co/RlrZsl6yHh 13 Jun 2019
  • RT @HIVLawCom: A new @HIVJusticeNet report analyses the growing global movement against #HIV criminalisation. Six countries saw precedent… 06 Jun 2019
  • #HIVIsNotaCrime! Now in Spanish, French & Russian -- #MakingMediaWork for #HIVJustice: An introduction to media eng… https://t.co/MP08yOzZSx 06 Jun 2019
  • RT @WOLA_org: New report by @WOLA_org, @IDPCnet, and @Dejusticia shed light on the disproportionate impact of pretrial detention for drug o… 05 Jun 2019
  • Thanks to #RobertCarrFund for recognising a global network focused on ending #HIVcriminalisation was work that need… https://t.co/PDdmGewkxL 29 May 2019
  • BREAKING - JUST RELEASED: New report analyses the successes and challenges of the growing global movement against… https://t.co/gcRgWJ0AwH 29 May 2019
  • Previewing our new report, Advancing #HIVJustice 3, published on May 29th, at the #ChallengeCrim intersectional dia… https://t.co/WB3HsGvJp6 23 May 2019
  • HJN is delighted to be part of this important cross-movement project to #ChallengeCrim globally. https://t.co/gp9KDC2Y5E 23 May 2019
  • RT @Account4All: "You have to work with grassroots civil society to make access to justice a reality and to ensure justice reaches every pe… 23 May 2019
  • Coming May 29th....Advancing HIV Justice 3: Growing the global movement against HIV criminalisation… https://t.co/bslamJNarH 17 May 2019
  • RT @alisapower: If you have NGO managerial skills and a commitment to human rights in the context of HIV - this is an enormously important,… 15 May 2019
  • Could you be one of our new HIV Justice Network Supervisory Board Members? Applications close 31st May 2019. Full… https://t.co/CfD2P85KoF 15 May 2019

Other wealthy countries with low overall HIV prevalence soon found themselves wrestling with similar policy options, with similarly wide variation in legal and policy responses.

The world’s first known conviction of a person for unprotected consensual sex without disclosure of his HIV-positive status occurred in the former West Germany (now the Federal Republic of Germany) in 1987. The case involved a 46-year-old American civilian who worked as a cook at a United States army base in Nuremburg, Bavaria. The defendant had acknowledged having sexual intercourse with at least three other men after learning that he was HIV-positive, but denied he intended to harm anyone. He received a two-year prison sentence “for attempting to inflict ‘grievous bodily harm’ by practicing unprotected sex.”1  Of note, the man’s arrest had immediately followed “the widely publicized announcement of stiff measures against the spread of the AIDS virus in the southern state of Bavaria.”1

Beginning in 1989, Canada used existing criminal laws to prosecute HIV-positive people for having otherwise consensual sex without disclosing their HIV status, with charges including criminal negligence causing bodily harm; common nuisance; assault; administering a noxious thing; and attempted murder.2  The number of prosecutions increased substantially following a 1998 Supreme Court ruling that if an HIV-positive person does not disclose his or her status before engaging in otherwise consensual sexual conduct that poses a ‘significant risk’ of HIV transmission, then the partner’s consent is invalid, thereby rendering the sex an assault in law.3

Early prosecutions in Australia reveal a complex pattern. Nine of the twelve known cases between 1991 and 2001 occurred in Victoria (one of eight jurisdictions), with one charge laid in each of three other states/territories. The first two known charges (‘reckless endangerment’) were laid against two sex workers (a man and a woman) but charges were dropped immediately before the committal hearing.

Possibly the world’s first-ever murder conviction for sexual HIV transmission took place in Italy in 2000, when an Italian man was found guilty of ‘culpable homicide’ for infecting his wife who subsequently died. There are no details regarding how the court proved his state of mind or whether he pleaded guilty or was found guilty following a trial. He was sentenced to 14 years in prison.

The next person was charged in 1993 for having unprotected sex without disclosing his HIV status. The defendant died between the committal hearing and the trial.4 Subsequent prosecutions, all relating to unprotected sex without disclosure, also “went unrealised or were overturned (but resulted in considerable media and public resentment), basically as a result of the low risk of transmission associated with individual sexual encounters.”5 The first conviction was obtained in 1998.6 The defendant was a 52-year-old bisexual man who was found guilty of having oral and anal sex with three men, two of whom tested HIV-positive. He committed suicide in prison.

By 2005, at least 36 European countries had either HIV-specific criminal laws or had used existing criminal laws to prosecute HIV exposure or transmission, and 21 had successfully prosecuted at least one person. However, just three European countries – Austria, Sweden and Switzerland – accounted for more than 60% of the total convictions, each having prosecuted more than 30 people living with HIV with cases starting in 1990, 1992 and 1998, respectively. Prosecutions in Europe were primarily for non-coercive sexual exposure or transmission.7

References

  1. New York Times Bavarian court convicts American in AIDS case. 17 November, 1987
  2. Elliot R Criminal law & HIV/AIDS: final report. Montreal: Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network/Canadian AIDS Society, 1996
  3. Elliott R After Cuerrier: Canadian criminal law and the non-disclosure of HIV-positive status. Montreal: Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network, 1999
  4. Cameron S Research undertaken for the Australian National Association of People Living with HIV/AIDS, unpublished, 2009
  5. Woodroffe M Criminal transmission of HIV in Australia. in Cameron S and Rule J (eds), The Criminalisation of HIV Transmission in Australia: legality, morality and reality NAPWA, 2009
  6. Houlihan A, (Ill-Legal) Lust is a Battle Field: HIV risk, socio-sexuality and criminality. Law and Society Association Australia and New Zealand (LSAANZ) Conference, Sydney, 2008
  7. GNP+, THT Criminalisation of HIV transmission in Europe. Available online at: www.gnpplus.net/criminalisation/index.shtml, 2005
This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.
Community Consensus Statement on Access to HIV Treatment and its Use for Prevention

Together, we can make it happen

We can end HIV soon if people have equal access to HIV drugs as treatment and as PrEP, and have free choice over whether to take them.

Launched today, the Community Consensus Statement is a basic set of principles aimed at making sure that happens.

The Community Consensus Statement is a joint initiative of AVAC, EATG, MSMGF, GNP+, HIV i-Base, the International HIV/AIDS Alliance, ITPC and NAM/aidsmap
close

This content was checked for accuracy at the time it was written. It may have been superseded by more recent developments. NAM recommends checking whether this is the most current information when making decisions that may affect your health.

NAM’s information is intended to support, rather than replace, consultation with a healthcare professional. Talk to your doctor or another member of your healthcare team for advice tailored to your situation.